Health Canada Ends the FSRN Process and What It Means for Your NHP Site Licence

Last updated: February 26, 2026
Health Canada Ends the FSRN Process and What It Means for Your NHP Site Licence
Andrew Parshad
President & Founder of Quality Smart Solutions

In This Article:

Health Canada bulletin announcing it ends FSRN process for natural health product foreign site reference numbers

If you manage regulatory submissions for natural health products, you likely already know that Health Canada ends FSRN acceptance as of February 16, 2026. Health Canada announced this change through Natural Health Products Site Licensing and Good Manufacturing Practices Inspection Bulletin No. 10.

The change affects how foreign manufacturing sites demonstrate GMP compliance when supporting a Canadian importer’s site licence application. For regulatory teams managing active licences or preparing new submissions, the window to adapt is already open.

This is not just an administrative update. Ending the Foreign Site Reference Number program reshapes how GMP evidence from foreign sites enters the site licensing pathway. It also removes a tool that many importers have relied on to support their submissions. Understanding what changed, what Health Canada no longer accepts, and what you need to do now will help you avoid delays, rejections, or compliance gaps that can stall a product launch.

What the Foreign Site Reference Number Was

Health Canada issued a Foreign Site Reference Number as a unique identifier for manufacturing, packaging, or labelling sites located outside of Canada. Receiving an FSRN meant a foreign site had completed a partial GMP assessment and met certain requirements under Part 3 of the Natural Health Products Regulations. For Canadian importers, a foreign supplier holding a valid FSRN simplified the site licence application by providing a recognized shorthand for that site’s compliance status.

That said, the FSRN was never a full site licence equivalent. It did not authorize a foreign site to export NHPs directly into Canada, and the regulations never required it. Over time, the process created confusion and added administrative burden without meaningfully improving GMP oversight.

Health Canada concluded that folding foreign site GMP evidence directly into the site licensing process would produce better results with less duplication.

What Changes on February 16, 2026 

The bulletin is direct. After February 16, 2026, Health Canada will no longer accept new FSRN applications. Any application submitted after this date will face outright rejection. Health Canada will also mark existing FSRN holders as “discontinued” in the Site Licence and Foreign Site Reference Number Holders List.

The FSRN authorization will eventually be removed from the Harmonized Site Licence and FSRN Application Form and the Site Licensing Guidance Document, though Health Canada has noted that housekeeping update is still in progress.

Foreign warehouses follow a parallel change on the same date. Site licence holders no longer need to list warehouses outside of Canada on their site licence. Health Canada will remove previously approved foreign warehouses from site licences when those licences go through an amendment or renewal. Removing a warehouse from the licence does not eliminate GMP obligations.

Foreign warehouses must still meet all applicable requirements under the Natural Health Products Regulations, regardless of whether they appear on a site licence.

How Foreign Sites Must Now Submit GMP Evidence 

Foreign sites that previously relied on an FSRN to support an importer’s site licence application must now submit GMP evidence through the standard site licensing pathway. This means the evidence is submitted as part of the importer’s site licence application, and the same standards for acceptable documentation apply.  

Health Canada’s Site Licensing Guidance Document outlines the acceptable forms of GMP evidence, which may include inspection reports, certificates of compliance, or other recognized documentation. 

Direct communication between Health Canada and foreign sites can still occur through the site licence generic email address, which allows for confidential exchange of information where needed. This channel remains available to support the transition and ongoing compliance discussions. 

If your current site licence lists foreign suppliers who held FSRNs, or if you are planning a new submission that would have previously included an FSRN, you will need to reassess your documentation strategy.  

Quality Smart Solutions’ NHP regulatory consultants can help you identify compliant GMP evidence alternatives and prepare submissions that meet Health Canada’s current expectations. 

What You Should Review Right Now 

Given that these changes are already in effect, focus your attention on the following areas:

  • Review any active site licence applications or pending amendments that reference an FSRN as GMP evidence. That reference is now outdated and may trigger a rejection.
  • Confirm with your foreign manufacturing partners that they hold current GMP documentation suitable for submission through the site licensing pathway.
  • Check whether your site licence lists any foreign warehouses. Those will be removed during your next renewal or amendment cycle. Confirm that those warehouses still meet GMP requirements even without appearing on the licence.

If you manage multiple product lines across several foreign sites, the administrative workload can escalate quickly. Acting early costs far less than responding to a site licence delay mid-launch.

FAQs

Does our foreign supplier need to start from scratch now that the FSRN is gone?

Not necessarily, though the transition does require action. Many foreign sites already hold GMP documentation in formats that Health Canada accepts through the site licensing pathway. The shift is not about re-qualifying your supplier but about how and where that evidence is submitted. Reviewing your supplier’s existing compliance documentation against the acceptable evidence options in Health Canada’s Site Licensing Guidance Document is the practical starting point. 

This is a common concern, and the answer requires careful attention. As of February 16, 2026, existing FSRNs are marked as discontinued and the FSRN authorization is considered outdated. Submitting a licence application that relies on a discontinued FSRN as its primary GMP evidence introduces real risk of rejection or a request for additional information. The safest path is to replace the FSRN reference with current, acceptable GMP documentation before or alongside your next submission. 

Not immediately in most cases. Previously approved foreign warehouses will remain on site licences until the licence is next updated through an amendment or renewal. However, once that update occurs, the warehouse will be removed. Businesses should use this transition window to confirm that all foreign warehouses continue to meet GMP requirements under the Natural Health Products Regulations, since the compliance obligation does not disappear when the listing does. 

Key Takeaways 

  • Health Canada ends FSRN acceptance effective February 16, 2026, and will reject any new FSRN applications submitted after that date.
  • Health Canada now classifies existing Foreign Site Reference Numbers as discontinued, making them unacceptable as GMP evidence in site licence submissions.
  • Foreign sites must now submit GMP evidence directly through the site licensing pathway using documentation that meets the standards in the Site Licensing Guidance Document.
  • Foreign warehouses no longer require listing on site licences, but they remain subject to all applicable GMP requirements.
  • Any active applications or upcoming renewals that reference an FSRN need immediate review to avoid delays or rejections.

Stay Ahead of Compliance Changes Before They Affect Your Timeline 

Regulatory changes rarely arrive with generous lead time, and their effects on product launches or licence renewals can be significant. The path forward here is clear. Foreign sites need compliant GMP documentation submitted through the right channel, and Health Canada has well-established standards for what qualifies.

If you need support reviewing your current site licence, updating your GMP evidence package, or preparing a new submission under the revised process, contact our regulatory experts at Quality Smart Solutions. Our NHP site licensing services are designed to help businesses move through Health Canada’s requirements accurately and efficiently, without the costly back-and-forth that comes from submissions that miss the mark. 

0/5 (0 Reviews)
Picture of Andrew Parshad
Andrew Parshad
Andrew Parshad is President, CEO and founder of Quality Smart Solutions, a North American compliance solutions provider offering regulatory and quality assurance services to comply with FDA & Health Canada brands and ingredients regulations in the categories of dietary supplements, foods, cosmetics, OTC drugs and medical devices. Andrew started Quality Smart Solutions in 2007. Since that time he and his firm has served thousands of clients worldwide . Andrew's affiliate company, Quality IMPORT Solutions that offers import agent services into the Canadian market as a government licensed importer for foods, dietary supplements and medical devices.
Follow the expert:
Related Articles
We use cookies to display personalized content, analyze site traffic, provide recommendations, and ensure you have a great browsing experience. By continuing to use our site, you consent to our use of cookies. Privacy Policy.